Auc. 112 Lot 73Syria.
Seleucus I Nicator (312–280 BC),
AR tetradrachm, Susa.
Condition: beautiful patina, near ef.
Video highlight: Watch now!
Estimate: 1.900 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 1472Norway.
Christian IV (1588–1648),
Speciedaler 1635, Christiana (Oslo).
Condition: rare, vf+ .
Estimate: 1.600 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 1881Teutonic Order.
Johann Kaspar (1664–1684),
double ducat 1666.
Condition: rare, ef.
Video highlight: Watch now!
Estimate: 6.200 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 1913City of Hildesheim.
5 gold guilders, 1528 (minted 1614–1620),
bearing the title of Charles V.
Condition: slightly worked, ef.
Estimate: 16.500 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 2025Baden.
Carl Friedrich (1806–1811),
Rhine gold ducat 1807.
Condition: rare, near ef/ef.
Estimate: 11.000 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 2759Württemberg.
Wilhelm II. (1891-1918),
3 Mark 1916 F.
Condition: first strike
Video highlight: Watch now!
Estimate: 5.600 EUR

Auc. 112 Lot 3154German Democratic Republic.
Collection from the estate of
Willi Stoph (SED official).
Set of decorations, including a certificate and
a charcoal drawing.
Condition: very rare, ef.
Estimate: 50.000 EUR

Auc. 113 Lot 171German Reich.
50 Marks,
January 5, 1899.
Condition: very rare, III-/IV+.
Estimate: 7.000 EUR

Auc. 113 Lot 358Federal Republic of Germany.
20 Deutsche Mark,
January 2, 1980, ZE/B.
Condition: I.
Estimate: 7.000 EUR

Auc. 113 Lot 901Silesia, Trebnitz.
10 Pfennig, n.d. (August 1914).
Municipal Main Treasury (Stadthauptkasse).
Condition: extremely rare, I-.
Estimate: 350 EUR
Archive: Coins, Medals and more

Planchet Error, Overstrike, Double-Strike, Etc.: Which Errors Affect the Price of a Coin? – Part 1

by Daniel Baumbach, translated by Maike Meßmann

The price of a coin does not only depend on its rarity and its overall quality. There are many things that may affect its value in a positive or negative way. This overview is intended to help you spot common features, to understand what certain terms in auction catalogues mean and to assess whether an offer is a good one or not.

Content

When you take a close look at a coin, you will spot features that can either have a positive or a negative effect on its value. Recognizing these features as well as knowing the right term to describe them is important for every coin collector. Photo: Elly2001 / CC BY-SA 4.0)

When you take a close look at a coin, you will spot features that can either have a positive or a negative effect on its value. Recognizing these features as well as knowing the right term to describe them is important for every coin collector. Photo: Elly2001 / CC BY-SA 4.0)

We break it down by the order in which these features may occur: prior to the minting process, during the minting process, during the handling of coins, during the cleaning process and, finally, features caused by environmental issues.

1 Prior to the Minting Process: Planchets

Let’s start with the features that have to do with the piece of metal used to mint the coins. This piece is called planchet or blank.

1.1 Planchet Errors

A coin is described as having a planchet error when there are imperfections or damage that occurred before the coin was struck, namely during the production of the planchet. These include bumps, nicks and impurities of the metal. Planchet errors have a negative effect on the price. However, regarding contemporary, machine-made coins with such defects, planchet errors can cause a coin to increase in value.

England, Edward IV. Penny, Dublin, between 1470-1473. The flan is small and irregular, therefore, only parts of the legend can be seen on this specimen. From Künker auction 165 (2021), lot 413.

England, Edward IV. Penny, Dublin, between 1470-1473. The flan is small and irregular, therefore, only parts of the legend can be seen on this specimen. From Künker auction 165 (2021), lot 413.

1.2 Large and Small Flans

Sometimes, auction catalogues indicate that a coin has a large or a small flan. Flan is just another word for planchet – i.e. for the metal disc that becomes a coin during the minting process. Coins with a small flan are smaller than the dies used to mint them – which means that parts of the image will be missing. Coins with a large flan, on the other hand, provide more than enough space for the entire design. Usually, large flans increase the value of a coin, whereas small flans tend to decrease the price.

An example for an overstrike: Crete, Phalasarna: hemi drachm, 280/270 BC, from Künker auction 136 (2008), lot 311. In this case, numismatists were even able to determine the original coin used for the overstrike: a tetrobol of Argos. Do you see the remains of the capital A on the head of Artemis?

An example for an overstrike: Crete, Phalasarna: hemi drachm, 280/270 BC, from Künker auction 136 (2008), lot 311. In this case, numismatists were even able to determine the original coin used for the overstrike: a tetrobol of Argos. Do you see the remains of the capital A on the head of Artemis?

1.3 Overstrikes

Collectors mainly get in contact with overstrikes in the field of ancient and medieval coins. Back then, it could happen that an old coin was used instead of a fresh new planchet. After all, new planchets weren’t always available. Overstruck coins were produced especially often by auxiliary and military mints. By doing so, it was possible to create coins with new images without great efforts or costs. In many cases, the original, overstruck coin image can still be recognized. Such overstrikes aren’t considered to reduce the coin’s value, they may even be of such high historical interest that they lead to an increase in value.

2 The Minting Process

Three men and five pairs of eyes: the double-strike of this specimen of a Saxon reichtstaler minted in 1596 in Dresden can easily be recognized. From Künker auction eLive 31 (2014), Lot 1208.

Three men and five pairs of eyes: the double-strike of this specimen of a Saxon reichtstaler minted in 1596 in Dresden can easily be recognized. From Künker auction eLive 31 (2014), Lot 1208.

2.1 Double-Strike

For thousands of years, coins were minted by hitting a die with a hammer onto a planchet, and underneath the planchet there was another die. In case the first strike wasn’t strong enough, the motif could not be clearly seen and a second strike was needed. Regarding many coins, several strikes were planned to be carried out in the first place. If the planchet or a die moved a little between two strikes, you could see it on the coin. The motif is slightly doubled, resembling a shadow. This is called a double-strike. Double-strikes that clearly affect the image reduce the specimen’s price.

This German rentenpfennig of 1924 is very off-centred, a feature that increases the value of 20th-century coinage. From Künker auction eLive Premium 286& 287 (2017), Lot 2695.

This German rentenpfennig of 1924 is very off-centred, a feature that increases the value of 20th-century coinage. From Künker auction eLive Premium 286& 287 (2017), Lot 2695.

2.2 Off-Centred Coins

The result of a die that is not placed exactly onto the planchet is an off-centred coin. One part of the planchet remains empty, which is why part of the image from the die is missing. Since slight and medium off-centre coins were rather the rule than the exception in the age of pre-machine minting, the term “fully centred” is sometimes found in auction catalogues to express that the die was very centred in this case, which has a positive effect on the price. Regarding machine-made coins of the modern age, it’s extremely rare for a severely off-centred coin to enter circulation, which is why it’s considered an error coin that usually realizes higher prices.

2.3 Weak Strikes

We speak of weak strikes when the minting process was not carried out properly, resulting in an impaired image on the coin. This includes cases where not enough force was applied – be it by machines or humans – and the image was only transferred poorly or incompletely onto the coin. A weak strike can also be caused by the dies: if the relief is too high, it can happen that there is simply not enough metal to fill both dies.

This reichstaler, minted in 1628 in the principality of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, has an planchet crack that is clearly visible on both sides of the coin. From Künker auction eLive 28 (2015), Lot 785.

This reichstaler, minted in 1628 in the pricipality of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, has an planchet crack that is clearly visible on both sides of the coin. From Künker auction eLive 28 (2015), Lot 785.

2.4 Planchet Crack

If a planchet is not heated properly in the production process, it can become brittle and crack in one or more places during the minting process. This is called an planchet crack. They can often be seen on both sides of the coin. Planchet cracks decrease the value of a specimen.

This Saxon silver medal, minted around 1631, has clearly visible lines on the reverse that were caused by a die crack. From Künker auction 297 (2017), lot 3762.

This Saxon silver medal, minted around 1631, has clearly visible lines on the reverse that were caused by a die crack. From Künker auction 297 (2017), lot 3762.

2.5 Die Cracks

Dies can also have cracks or chips due to manufacturing defects or wear. The damaged spots will then be visible on the coins. Frequently, several specimens of one coin type with the same error are known of. Unlike planchet cracks, die cracks can only be seen on one side of the coin. Die cracks also reduce the value of a coin.

A continuation of this article will be published soon. It will deal with wear and tear, cleaning and consequences of environmental processes. 

Auction 169. Lot 163Kings of Cappadocia,
Orophernes usurper circa 160-156.
Tetradrachm, Priene circa 160-156,
AR 32 mm, 16.53 g.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF
Auction 170. Lot 231Hadrian augustus, 117 – 138.
Sestertius,
Roma 130-133,
Æ 32 mm, 26.50 g.
Estimate: 350.000 CHF
Auction 171. Lot 1029Joseph I,
1687 King of Hungary and Bohemia,
1690 Roman-German King,
1705-1711 Emperor.
Medal (100 Ducats) undated (1690),
AV 81 mm, 348.18 g.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF
Auction 171. Lot 1127Duchy of Bayern.
Albrecht V, 1550-1579.
Medal (25 Ducats) undated (c. 1575),
AV 73 mm, 86.67 g.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF
Auction 171. Lot 1235City of Hamburg.
2 Portugalöser (20 Ducats) undated (1574/1577),
mint master Andreas Metzner,
AV 41 mm, 70.05 g.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF
Auction 171. Lot 1492Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth.
Zygmunt III Waza, 1587-1632,
1592/1599 King of Sweden.
70 Ducats 1621, Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) mint,
mint master Jacob Jacobson van Emden,
AV 69 mm, 243 g.
Estimate: 300.000 CHF
Auction 171. Lot 1577Georgios I (Γεώργιος), 1863-1913.
50 Drachmai 1875,
Paris mint,
AV 28 mm, 16.09 g.
Estimate: 125.000 CHF
Auction 172. Lot 1682Edward VIII, 1936.
AE Pattern Penny, 1937,
by T. H. Paget & C. W. Coombes.
Estimate: 175.000 CHF
Auction 173. Lot 1831Antonio Teodoro Trivulzio, 1676–1678.
10 zecchini 1677,
AV 34.57 g. ø 50 mm.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF
Auction 174. Lot 2674Charles I of Anjou
before the Vespri Siciliani (30th March 1282).
Tarì or cavallino,
Messina 1266-1278,
AV 8.65 g.
Estimate: 150.000 CHF

Don’t miss a thing!

Sign up to our newsletter here