Estimate: 40.000 EuroKelten. Gallien.
Vercingetorix, 52 v. Chr.
Goldstater.
Sehr selten.
Prägeschwächen, sonst sehr schön.
29
Estimate: 50.000 EuroM. Iunius Brutus.
Denar, 42,
Lagermünzstätte in Kleinasien oder Nordgriechenland.
Sehr selten.
Av. schön. Rv. schön bis sehr schön.
518
Estimate: 15.000 EuroByzanz. Revolte der Heraclii, 608-610.
Solidus, unbestimmte Münzstätte.
Äußerst selten. Wohl unediert.
Aus Sammlung Topp.
Fast vorzüglich.
945
Estimate: 10.000 EuroNürnberg. Goldmedaille 1624,
auf die Münzkonvention der drei korrespondierenden
Kreise Bayern, Franken und Schwaben.
Sehr selten, nur wenige Exemplare in Gold bekannt.
Fast Stempelglanz.
2458
Estimate: 100.000 EuroBraunschweig-Wolfenbüttel. Friedrich Ulrich, 1613-1634.
Löser zu 10 Reichstalern 1614, Goslar oder Zellerfeld.
Äußerst selten. Aus Altbestand der Preussag in Goslar,
erworben am 28. Februar 1977.
Sehr schön.
4111
Estimate: 30.000 EuroDeutsches Kaiserreich. Sachsen.
Georg. Probe zu 5 Mark 1902.
Äußerst selten, wohl nur dieses Exemplar bekannt.
Vorzüglich bis Stempelglanz aus polierter Platte.
2946
Estimate: 10.000 EuroRömisch-Deutsches Reich.
Ferdinand III., 1625-1627-1657.
Vierfacher Schautaler 1629, Prag.
Äußerst selten.
Aus Sammlung Kommerzialrat Dr. Herbert Wenzel.
Fast vorzüglich.
4757
Estimate: 125.000 EuroPolen.
Sigismund III., 1587-1632.
Portugalöser zu 10 Dukaten o. J.,
vermutlich Krakau.
Äußerst selten.
Gutes sehr schön.
2173
Estimate: 40.000 EuroNiederlande. Haarlem.
Goldmedaille 1778 von J. G. Holtzhey,
Ehrenmedaille von Teyler's Godgeleerd Genootschap,
verliehen 1796 an den Pastor und Lehrer Jan Brouwer.
Äußert selten.
Vorzüglich.
2158
Estimate: 15.000 EuroKurfürstlich Pfälzischer Hausritterorden vom hl. Hubertus.
Großes, sehr gewichtiges Kleinod zum Schulterband,
Anfertigung von ca. 1767.
Äußerst selten.
Aus dem persönlichen Nachlass von
Herzog Wilhelm in Bayern. II.
4025
Archive: People and Markets

IAPN Asks Collectors to Help Protect Roman Coin Collecting

by Peter Tompa, IAPN Executive Director

The US State Department has announced a proposed renewal of a cultural property Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Republic of Italy. There is a danger that this will provide an excuse for US import restrictions implementing that MOU to be expanded to include late Roman Republican and Roman Imperial Coins.

Content

Import restrictions could make it far more difficult to import such coins from legitimate markets in Europe like those in the United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland.

Why? Because they would give US Customs the authority to assume that any late Roman Republican or Roman Imperial coins with a country of origin/manufacture of Italy (i.e., Rome and other late Imperial mints of Aquileia, Mediolanum, Ostia, Ravenna, and Ticinum) are the “cultural property” of the modern Republic of Italy.

US Customs could then demand that the importer “prove” that such coins were out of Italy before the effective date of any governing regulations, which can be difficult to do for many coins, particularly low value ones like most Roman coins.

And if you can’t provide this information? The coin(s) could be detained, seized and “repatriated” to the Italian government.

What Can You Do?

What can you do? Go to https://www.regulations.gov/, search for dos-2024-0048, and then click the blue “comment now” button. Or try this direct link to the dos-2024-0048 and this one to the comment section of dos-2024-0048.

What Can You Say?

What can you say? Your own comments focusing on how import restrictions might make it more difficult to purchase coins to appreciate ancient history and culture are the best, but here is a short model for you to use for your own comments:

Please reject any effort to expand current restrictions to include Roman coins. The Coin Hoards of the Roman Empire database lists over 6 million such coins. See https://chre.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/. Roman coins circulated from the UK to Sri Lanka so it is improper to assume any one individual coin is Italian Cultural Property.  Import restrictions would damage my ability to learn more about ancient history and negatively impact my own interactions with other collectors, especially those in Europe where collecting Roman coins is particularly popular. 

Comments Must Be Made on or Before January 27, 2025. You do not have to be a US Citizen to comment. On the contrary, Peter Tompa thinks that it could help if the US government received feedback from collectors and dealers in Italy and other affected countries.

Comments by the IAPN on Different MOUs

The International Association of Professional Numismatists has asked the US State Department Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) to advocate ending or limiting damaging embargoes imposed on collector’s coins openly and legally sold abroad, particularly in legitimate markets in Europe. The comments on the proposed renewal of a Cultural Property Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Republic of Italy also specifically asks that any extension not be used as an excuse to impose new import restrictions on widely circulating and collected late Roman Republican or Roman Imperial coins. These comments can be found here:

Proposed Renewal of the current MOU with the Republic of Italy.

Proposed New MOU with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

Proposed Renewal of the current MOU with the Republic of Chile.

Proposed Renewal of the current MOU with Kingdom of Morocco.

Don’t miss a thing!

Subscribe to our newsletter here